Fatcow Icon
State will take back $1.5 million
by Chris Cooper Managing Editor chriscndl@bellsouth.net
Apr 28, 2009 | 6093 views | 6 6 comments | 14 14 recommendations | email to a friend | print
A special called meeting of the Russellville City Council is scheduled for tonight to discuss the Rockwell Recreation Park.

Last Tuesday city council stopped construction plans on the $1.5 million park with a five to one vote (councilman Russell Jones voted no). Councilman Lanny McPherson made the motion to stop the park’s construction after saying he thought it was the “wrong time” to build the park. He said even though he thought the park was a good idea he was concerned about how much money it may take to build it and how much it may take to maintain it once it is built. He and councilman Jimmy Davenport were both very vocal about the economy and its effects on the city’s finances. They both were worried about beginning a project that might dip into the city’s already red ink.

The city of Russellville received $1.5 million from the state’s Energy and Environmental Protection Cabinet (EPPC) in 2007 taken from the multi-million dollar Rockwell International Corp. settlement. The money was earmarked to build the new park.

Zick, who has been adamant about building the park, assured the council that the park’s construction would not go over the allotted $1.5 million and it would only take $1,000 additional dollars to maintain it each year. Zick also told the council he was afraid if they put the park on hold the state would take back the $1.5 million and may even ask for the interest that has been drawing on the money as well as the $200,000 already spent to backfill the property located on Armory Drive.

Zick told the N-D&L Monday that he had spoken with Jon Horne, the attorney who is handling the state’s settlement with the EPPC and was told if the city of Russellville did not continue to work on and finish the Rockwell Recreational park project in a timely manner, they would have to return the $1.5 million dollars to the EPPC, which will include what has already been spent plus any interest accrued.

“I was afraid this was going to happen,” said Zick adding that Horne had told him the only delays that would be accepted would be due to weather or construction issues.

Zick said he hopes the council votes to continue the park project at Tuesday’s special called meeting and doesn’t allow the free money to be taken away.

Park plans show two state-of-the-art soccer and baseball diamonds, a skate-board park, climbing wall, trails, a wetland for educational study, restrooms, concession facilities, a playground and plenty of parking.
Comments
(6)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
barefeets
|
April 30, 2009
though i am a bit saddened that the $1.5 million from the settlement will be returned, i have always thought the park was a 'pie in the sky' notion. the city of russellville was not the only area affected by Rockwell and their polluting practices. there are plenty of farm families in north logan county who can't do a thing with land polluted by this industry, which by the way, is still praised in this county. while the county should have awarded the entire $10 million settlement, this was not a good idea. maybe now we can actually have some thought put into how the community's share of the penalty should be used. but keep in mind, it must be used to rehabilitate or revitalize areas polluted. and while we are on the subject, can we get that hole in the park filled in, please? it is a ridiculous eyesore and embarassment.
Niwtcl
|
April 28, 2009
I cannot believe that we would even think of returning $1.5m of money that could do so much good for our youth. For a long time, many have expressed how important it is to have something for our youth to do...well, here it is. What a great opportunity we have to offer a variety of activities to so many. In addition, the many people who would come to Russellville to attend various events may very well eat at the many restaurants close by. As the restaurants' revenue increases, the city will also reap this increase in occupational proceeds. I hope that we do not let politics enter into our decision - and that the city council will vote to continue with this project for our youth's sake.
Niwtcl
|
April 28, 2009
Not utilizing a $1.5m grant in this day and time is irresponsible. I wish people would leave the politics out of it and realize that this park would fulfill what so many have been asking for in our county - a place for our youth to gather and enjoy activities.

I am puzzled why some council members cannot understand this business aspect. Also, the number of people who would come to Russellville to participate in events would bring quite a lot of dollars with them to spend at all of the restaurants close by. I cannot imagine giving up that revenue. The more proceeds our restaurants take in, the more city occupational proceeds we get. This alone, could very well take care of the annual maintenance.

As a professional financial person, I support growth in this area for our city.
Responsible
|
April 28, 2009
Even with its problems, Russellville is better off with the Carpenter Center, and it will be better off with a new park and new soccer and baseball fields. Think of it this way -- if you are a business looking to locate a new plant, where do you locate? Communities that are attractive places to work and live. Young families want facilities like the Carpenter Center and these fields. Russellville needs these families if it is going to be a vital community. As for the jobs, they don't come from the $1000 -- but from the installation work and then the spin-off from events helds at the fields. Just look how many tournaments are in Kentucky: http://www.kysoccer.org/tournaments/tournaments.html. In Edmond, Oklahoma, the town is using its own money to create fields, as it sees a real economic impact from them. http://newsok.com/article/3282508/
uk4evr
|
April 28, 2009
In response to the post by Responsible. I wonder if the exact same thing wasn't said when the Carpenter Foundation gave the city the funds to build the now "infamous" Carpenter center. Let's step back for a minute and look at all the cost, lawsuits, grief, hardships, and even broken friendships that free money has brought us. And even today we continue to debate whether to continue with repairs and pouring money into this one time GIFT. As far as providing jobs Zick himself said it would only cost $1,000 a year to maintain the park. I'll be hard to support a family on that. But I think he's blowing smoke, because in reality the city will be foutunate to be able to maintain it once it is built. He can't even finish a fish pond now. I oppose Mayor Zick and his efforts!
Responsible
|
April 28, 2009
How can anyone oppose a $1.5 million "gift"? This project will bring construction jobs and long term benefits to the community. It's a stimulus Russellville needs badly. I support Mayor Zick and his efforts!
Weather
Sponsored By:

Lottery
Sponsored By:

Stocks
Sponsored By:

Gas Prices
Sponsored By:

Featured Businesses
Recipes
Sponsored By: