Fatcow Icon
Council wins turf wars
by Chris Cooper Managing Editor
Nov 06, 2009 | 2074 views | 5 5 comments | 9 9 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Using artificial turf on two soccer fields in Russellville’s new recreational park was nixed Tuesday by a 4-2 vote of the city council.

Councilman Lanny McPherson said it would be one of the biggest mistakes the council could ever make by accepting a bid of $438,000 to turf both fields at the park, which is being paid for by $1.5 million in Rockwell settlement funds.

It’s not necessarily the bid price that bothered McPherson and his fellow council members who voted with him (Jimmy Davenport, Pat Bell and Doug Nash), but that the taxpayers would have to foot the bill in 10 or 11 years when it was time to replace the turf.

“These companies try to get you into their business by offering this price because they know after you do they got you for replacement,” said McPherson adding, “If we do this we will have to put $100,000 into the budget each year to save up for the cost of replacing the turf in the future.”

Using artificial turf on the two soccer fields along with the softball field, which will cost an additional $200,000, was an idea that originated from the beginning of the project claimed Mayor Gene Zick, who has spent the last several months researching turf by visiting several soccer fields and suppliers – some as far away as Texas and North Carolina. An engineering firm was also hired to act as a consultant.

“I don’t understand why the council is balking at this now. In the beginning of the project it was said that turf prices would probably come in at $7 a square foot. This company is offering it at $4 a square foot. The price should not be a surprise, but in fact a relief,” said Zick.

The city received $1.5 million from the state’s Energy & Environmental Protection Cabinet (EEPC) in 2007 to build the park. The money came from a settlement between the state and Rockwell International, a long-serving industry in Russellville that released Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) into the environment. The property the park is located on was donated to the city by Rockwell along with the old Chrysler building beside McDonald’s.

Mayor Zick tried Tuesday night to show the benefits of laying artificial turf in comparison to McPherson’s suggestion of sand based Bermuda grass.

“It has rained six inches in October alone. Do you know what that kind of rain would do to a grass soccer field?” asked Zick.

Putting turf on the fields would allow for kids to play in tournaments throughout the year, where grass would prevent activity depending on the weather, according to Zick.

McPherson disagreed with Zick, saying he had done some research on artificial turf and found there was a field in Texas that when it was 98 degrees outside the field reached temperatures of 176 degrees and irrigation was used to cool them off.

“I don’t want to risk kids getting heat stroke,” said McPherson.

McPherson said he read in the News-Democrat & Leader where Zick was quoted saying there would have to be several items – such as bleachers, scoreboards, walking trails, bridges and a skate park – that would have to be donated in the park.

“We can put sand-based Bermuda grass on the two fields for $9,800, which would save money to spend on these donated items,” said McPherson. “You don’t have to replace grass and the maintenance would not be that much.”

Zick said there was another issue at hand involving the management agreement between the state, the city and Rockwell that spelled out the city had to put artificial turf on the fields to act as a additional environmental barrier between the soil that could hold PCBs and the surface.

“I’ve never seen that document,” said McPherson. “I think if we do have that it’s a shame we signed it. We should not be held to something we can’t afford. This is like trying to by a Mercedes with a Chevrolet budget.”

Crystal Cavanah, a soccer mom and local realtor spoke at Tuesday’s meeting saying she was embarrassed when she took a client to the city/county park because the grass was so high.

“We can’t mow the grass we have now. We really need to work on our town and community because this is our future and our kid’s future,” said Cavanah adding she has been to tournaments where they have spent $500 and was unable to play because of the condition of the fields.

“I don’t think the differences in artificial turf and grass will keep tournaments from happening,” said councilman Jimmy Davenport. “This is about what the taxpayer’s will inherit and I don’t want to worry about what is going to get donated and what isn’t.”

Council member Pat Bell said she wanted to make sure the project did not run over budget and said she was not for raising taxes in the future to pay for its replacement.

Soccer mom Melissa Burnett said citizens would end up paying higher taxes in the future for something else anyway. “I remember you all talking about artificial turf a long time ago. You were told it would be $7 a square foot and you said nothing and now it’s $4 and you just now want to talk about it,” said Burnett.

A frustrated Parks & Rec director Kathy Maroney said she can’t sell the park to possible donators if she doesn’t have support from the city.

“There is never a positive thing said about the parks. It’s hard to solicit when you won’t even back it,” said Maroney to the council.

After McPherson’s motion passed with Councilman Jack Whipple and Russell Jones voting against the motion, Zick said he it was unfortunate.

“I expect the state relative to the progress of this park will be saying they want their $1.5 million back,” said Zick, ending the discussion.
Comments
(5)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
I love turf!
|
November 09, 2009
Well, Russellville is actually a city, http://www.russellvilleky.org/

and lots of places its size have turf fields. I know of one town with a population of 7000 people that has 5 turf fields. They run tournaments all year long and it helps the town's economy. And think what your lawn looks like in July (brown) and January (brown again) -- the turf will be green and usable all year long. With all the rain Russellville has had, the grass fields would have to dry out before they could be used. Turf could be used in the rain and immediately after the rain. Why would the Mayor support this if it were not going to be good for the City in his view?
just me
|
November 09, 2009
anonymous, Russellville is not a city,school or university...we have no money and very little reason to have a soccer field except to appease the mayor and a few soccer moms. Thank you councilpeople, Nash, McPherson, Davenport and Bell, Job well done!
anonymous
|
November 06, 2009
These soccer moms are only concerned about their children playing soccer maybe the next 2-3 years at the most. The problem is in 10 years when the fields need new turf and that council is presented with the bill that can't be paid, these soccer moms lobbying for turf now will be no where to be found. This is a long term project and you people should be thinking long term. You people should be thanking Bell, Davenport, McPherson, and Nash. This motion might just save the entire project. THINK ABOUT IT!
anonymous
|
November 06, 2009
Everywhere you go, the new fields being installed by cities, schools and colleges are turf.
butcher2
|
November 06, 2009
Thank you councilpeople, or 4 of you anyway,for looking out for the welfare of the citizens. I have nothing against turf, but if it means doing without essentials like scoreboards, dugouts etc,etc than it is a no-brainer! Soccer moms wants things now or yesterday, but you don't have 100,000 to sock away every year to buy new turf, so where is the logic to turf?? why don't we think long term and not for the moment?
Weather
Sponsored By:

Lottery
Sponsored By:

Stocks
Sponsored By:

Gas Prices
Sponsored By:

Featured Businesses
Recipes
Sponsored By: